Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11547/5270
Title: | THE UNITED NATIONS PERMANENT SECURITY MEMBERS: A CASE FOR REPLACEMENT OR EXPANSION |
Authors: | Nwani, Chijioke |
Keywords: | Expansion Replacement Political Economic United Nations United Nations Security Council Genişleme Değişim Politik Ekonomik Birleşmiş Milletler Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi |
Issue Date: | Jan-2019 |
Publisher: | ISTANBUL AYDIN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES |
Abstract: | The most powerful organ of the United Nations (UN), the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has been under various criticisms over the last decade and one of the major areas that is being criticized worldwide was its membership. Both members and non-members of the UNSC have questioned the nature or state of the current five membership members namely United States, Russia, United Kingdom, China and France. These five permanent members also have their own sentiments regarding expansion or replacement appeals from different countries. Obviously, the concerns of the five permanent members are related with economic, military and political interests which overlap each other. This study therefore assesses both the advantage and disadvantages of each of the appeals by matching them against the future and effectiveness of the Council. After the assessment of the appeals from different angles, the study also makes specific recommendations as to whether expansion or replacement would be the best option, judging from the current state of global affairs. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11547/5270 |
Appears in Collections: | Tezler -- Thesis |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
10239312.pdf | 1.22 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.